Spatial patterns of the cap-binding complex eIF4F in human melanoma cells.

As a central node of protein synthesis, the cap-binding complex, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 F (eIF4F), is involved in cell homeostasis, development and tumorigenesis. A large body of literature exists on the regulation and function of eIF4F in cancer cells, however the intracellular localization patterns of this complex are largely unknown. Since different subsets of mRNAs are translated in distinct subcellular compartments, understanding the distribution of translation initiation factors in the cell is of major interest. Here, we developed an in situ detection method for eIF4F at the single cell level. By using an image-based spot feature analysis pipeline as well as supervised machine learning, we identify five distinct spatial patterns of the eIF4F translation initiation complex in human melanoma cells. The quantity of eIF4F complex per cell correlated with the global mRNA translation activity, and its variation is dynamically regulated by cell state or extracellular stimuli. In contrast, the spatial patterns of eIF4F complexes at the single cell level could distinguish melanoma cells harboring different oncogenic driver mutations. This suggests that different tumorigenic contexts differentially regulate the subcellular localization of mRNA translation, with specific localization of eIF4F potentially associated with melanoma cell chemoresistance.

The multiple roles of LDH in cancer.

High serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels are typically associated with a poor prognosis in many cancer types. Even the most effective drugs, which have radically improved outcomes in patients with melanoma over the past decade, provide only marginal benefit to those with high serum LDH levels. When viewed separately from the oncological, biochemical, biological and immunological perspectives, serum LDH is often interpreted in very different ways. Oncologists usually see high serum LDH only as a robust biomarker of a poor prognosis, and biochemists are aware of the complexity of the various LDH isoforms and of their key roles in cancer metabolism, whereas LDH is typically considered to be oncogenic and/or immunosuppressive by cancer biologists and immunologists. Integrating these various viewpoints shows that the regulation of the five LDH isoforms, and their enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions is closely related to key oncological processes. In this Review, we highlight that serum LDH is far more than a simple indicator of tumour burden; it is a complex biomarker associated with the activation of several oncogenic signalling pathways as well as with the metabolic activity, invasiveness and immunogenicity of many tumours, and constitutes an extremely attractive target for cancer therapy.

A PD-1/PD-L1 Proximity Assay as a Theranostic Marker for PD-1 Blockade in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma.

PURPOSE: Less than 50% of patients with melanoma respond to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1), and this treatment can induce severe toxicity. Predictive markers are thus needed to improve the benefit/risk ratio of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Baseline tumor parameters such as programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, CD8+ T-cell infiltration, mutational burden, and various transcriptomic signatures are associated with response to ICI, but their predictive values are not sufficient. Interaction between PD-1 and its main ligand, PD-L1, appears as a valuable target of anti-PD-1 therapy. Thus, instead of looking at PD-L1 expression only, we evaluated the predictive value of the proximity between PD-1 and its neighboring PD-L1 molecules in terms of response to anti-PD-1 therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: PD-1/PD-L1 proximity was assessed by proximity ligation assay (PLA) on 137 samples from two cohorts (exploratory n = 66 and validation n = 71) of samples from patients with melanoma treated with anti-PD-1±anti-CTLA-4. Additional predictive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression (MELscore), CD8+ cells density, and NanoString RNA signature, were also evaluated. RESULTS: A PD-1/PD-L1 PLA model was developed to predict tumor response in an exploratory cohort and further evaluated in an independent validation cohort. This score showed higher predictive ability (AUC = 0.85 and 0.79 in the two cohorts, respectively) for PD-1/PD-L1 PLA as compared with other parameters (AUC = 0.71-0.77). Progression-free and overall survival were significantly longer in patients with high PLA values (P = 0.00019 and P < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The proximity between PD-1 and PD-L1, easily assessed by this PLA on one formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded section, appears as a new biomarker of anti-PD-1 efficacy.

Starting Imatinib at 400 mg Daily in Patients with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Harboring KIT Exon 9 Mutations: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective analyses suggest that patients with advanced KIT exon 9-mutated gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) receiving imatinib 800 mg (rather than 400 mg) daily have better outcomes. In the adjuvant setting, the question of the optimal dose of imatinib remains unsettled. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to retrospectively assess the activity of imatinib 400 mg in both the adjuvant and the advanced settings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter study of patients with KIT exon 9-mutated GIST starting imatinib at 400 mg daily. We examined the relapse-free survival (RFS) among high-risk patients either receiving or not receiving adjuvant imatinib. In patients with advanced disease, progression-free survival (PFS, progression under imatinib 400 mg), time to imatinib failure (TIF, progression under imatinib 400, then 800 mg upon first progression), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: In the post-operative setting (n = 37), 20 patients received adjuvant imatinib. Median RFS in high-risk patients receiving adjuvant imatinib (n = 14) was not reached (95% CI 17.5-46.6) versus 13.6 months (95% CI 4.7-13.6) for those who did not (p = 0.37), after a median follow-up of 58 months. RFS at 36 months was 63% (30.3-96.6) versus 40% (95% CI 0-82.9), p = 0.2. In advanced disease (n = 28), median PFS, TIF and OS were 12.7 months (95% CI 6.1-18.2), 21.0 months (95% CI 17.4-28.1) and 47.0 months (95% CI 33.5-69.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of a retrospective analysis and the small number of patients, the benefit of adjuvant imatinib 400 mg daily in high-risk patients appeared relevant. Patients with advanced disease receiving imatinib 400 mg with subsequent dose escalation had a TIF similar to that observed with an initial dose of 800 mg. Intra-patient dose escalation in this setting might be an option.

Melanoma Persister Cells Are Tolerant to BRAF/MEK Inhibitors via ACOX1-Mediated Fatty Acid Oxidation.

Emerging evidence indicates that non-mutational drug tolerance mechanisms underlie the survival of residual cancer "persister" cells. Here, we find that BRAF(V600E) mutant melanoma persister cells tolerant to BRAF/MEK inhibitors switch their metabolism from glycolysis to oxidative respiration supported by peroxisomal fatty acid ß-oxidation (FAO) that is transcriptionally regulated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα). Knockdown of the key peroxisomal FAO enzyme, acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (ACOX1), as well as treatment with the peroxisomal FAO inhibitor thioridazine, specifically suppresses the oxidative respiration of persister cells and significantly decreases their emergence. Consistently, a combination treatment of BRAF/MEK inhibitors with thioridazine in human-melanoma-bearing mice results in a durable anti-tumor response. In BRAF(V600E) melanoma samples from patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, higher baseline expression of FAO-related genes and PPARα correlates with patients' outcomes. These results pave the way for a metabolic strategy to overcome drug resistance.

An epitranscriptomic mechanism underlies selective mRNA translation remodelling in melanoma persister cells.

Cancer persister cells tolerate anticancer drugs and serve as the founders of acquired resistance and cancer relapse. Here we show that a subpopulation of BRAFV600 mutant melanoma cells that tolerates exposure to BRAF and MEK inhibitors undergoes a reversible remodelling of mRNA translation that evolves in parallel with drug sensitivity. Although this process is associated with a global reduction in protein synthesis, a subset of mRNAs undergoes an increased efficiency in translation. Inhibiting the eIF4A RNA helicase, a component of the eIF4F translation initiation complex, abrogates this selectively increased translation and is lethal to persister cells. Translation remodelling in persister cells coincides with an increased N6-methyladenosine modification in the 5'-untranslated region of some highly translated mRNAs. Combination of eIF4A inhibitor with BRAF and MEK inhibitors effectively inhibits the emergence of persister cells and may represent a new therapeutic strategy to prevent acquired drug resistance.

[Stage 1 germ-cell tumour]. / Tumeurs germinales de stade I.

Stage I germ-cell tumors are rare and highly curable diseases. As such, management of these tumours should carefully follow guidelines. Initial management is based on orchiectomy and several options as adjuvant therapy. Pro's and con's should be discussed with the patient for a personalized management. Patients with stage 1 germ-cell tumours should be addressed to expert centers.

[What biomarkers for the future? The point of view of the residents in oncology after the ESMO 2016 Congress]. / Quels biomarqueurs d'avenir ? Le point de vue des internes en oncologie à l'issue du congrès de l'ESMO 2016.

Since the advent of the HER2 biomarker allowing access to treatment with trastuzumab, we observe an explosion in research for biomarkers, in which the economic pressure linked to the costs of developing new products must not be overlooked, in order to better select the molecules to be developed and the patients who can benefit from them. Personalized medicine takes a little more space each year in the overall care of our patients and the search for specific indicators, has become unavoidable. Rapid identification of oncogenic changes, their therapeutic targeting and the anticipation of resistance or toxicity mechanisms is a challenge. From blood markers, proteins to tumor genomic profiling and new markers in medical imaging, clinicians, researchers, and patients all are looking for the Holy Grail. This article synthetizes oncology resident's reflexions during the ESMO congress which took place in Copenhagen from 7 to 11 October 2016. The aim was to select the most relevant or promising results for future clinical practice.